We are three Finns who maintain this site as a showcase of how to think differently. We like to consider Zygomatica a collection of essays rather than just a current-events blog.
- Jakke Mäkelä: Google+ page, LinkedIn page. Physicist, but not ideologically — it’s the methods that matter. Training: PhD, physics (University of Helsinki, Finland). Interests: anything that can be twisted into numbers; hazards and warnings; invisible risks. Worries: Copyright, IPR, and net neutrality (it’s complicated). Happiness: family, dry humor, and thinking about things. Email: click here.
- Niko Porjo: LinkedIn page, Google+ page. Joys: comedy, cycling and spotting argumentation errors in live speech. Physicist and thinker, a little bit of an amateur philosopher. I like to build things but when they work that’s enough, no polishing.
- Timo Tokkonen: LinkedIn page. Thinking, understanding and discovering (surprisingly) new things make me tick. I search for the questions not asked and make happen. Keeping the mind and eyes open and photographing the surprising beauty. Once an astronomer, always an astronomer. I try to understand the world and mankind through Philosophy of Technology, Seinfeld and Jacques Tati among others. Cleverness beats force. Cover is nothing without content and content is nothing without structure. There is always an alternative.
We write about things that happen to interest us. We use either English or Finnish, depending on the subject matter. Whenever a theme seems to interest us for a longer time, we tend to set up a page around that theme.
- On this site, rationality is king. This is not site to teach “rational thinking”. Off-site, members believe what they want. On-site, rationality and skepticism are strictly enforced.
- Corollary: Rationality always fails in the end. That is how life works. Rationality too easily turns into hubris. Thus, it is best to start with the assumption that we will fail.
- Anything can be a source of information, if properly interpreted. We mean this literally, and hope to show it by examples.
- Numbers are good, but only if you are skeptical of them. If it can be put into numbers, it should be put into numbers. But don’t trust the numbers.
- Crowdsourcing is good, but responsibility is individual. We hope to make all projects collaborative, with multiple outside participants. But one person always has to stand by the end result, risking any reputation he might have.
- Open access is good, open science is good. This site operates with a Creative Commons license.
- Like them or not, patents can be an interesting source of information. Patents serve a purpose that is underutilized in the open community: they are information about something that someone has considered to be important.
- What we do, we do throroughly. We document. “Open science” easily becomes “sloppy science”. We don’t produce peer-reviewable material, but want to retain high standards.
- All opinions and ideas on this site are personal. We represent no one except ourselves.